Name _________________________

 

Date __________________________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ERTH 465

Fall 2015

 

 

 

Lab 4

 

Analysis of Divergence

 

 

 

 

1.       All labs are to be kept in a three hole binder.  Turn in the binder when you have finished the Lab.

 

2.       Show all work in mathematical problems.  No credit given if only answer is provided.

 


A.  General

 

In this lab you will compute horizontal divergence at the 300 mb level by finite difference approximation of the derivatives ∂u/∂x and ∂v/∂y.

 

B.  Case Study

 

You are provided with the following maps for 00 UTC 28 September 1994:

 

 

1.  Unanalyzed 300 mb chart with raw data.

2.  300 mb “u wind component”

3.  300 mb “v wind component”

4. NCEP Reanalysis of 500 mb heights, Absolute Vorticity

5. NCEP Reanalysis of 1000 mb heights, 1000-500 mb thickness.

6. NCEP Reanalysis of 500 mb Vertical Velocity.

7.  300 mb wind vectors with data domain and analysis grid for this exercise.

 

 

C.  Nature of Analysis

 

As discussed in class (and Bluestein points out), horizontal divergence is the sum of two small derivatives that often have opposite sign.  Finite difference approximation of the derivatives often shows that the terms themselves may be one or two orders of magnitude larger than the net divergence when both are added algebraically.  Thus, wind speed components would need to be accurate to two or three places in order for the resulting divergence estimates to be accurate.

 

It is still a useful exercise to compute divergence from the expression in rectangular coordinates and compare with the actual divergence field as produced by the wxp programs.  The case chosen is for a situation in which a strong jet streak was moving around a relatively strong trough over the eastern United States.

 

D.  General Procedure

 

We are going to use a relatively coarse analysis grid.  Each point at which we would like to have divergence estimates is 2.5 degrees of latitude and the same distance on the meridians (but it won't be 2.5 degrees, as explained in class.  It will be interesting to see if your analysis captures the “synoptic scale flavor” of the wxp field.

 

We also will be using a so-called “centered difference” approach in evaluating the derivatives.  That simply means that the analysis point is at the origin of the finite difference cross and the end points are a certain distance +/-∆s along the x and y axes from the origin.

 

The finite difference approximations of the derivative ∂u/∂x are obtained at each of the analysis grid points and the values are then plotted in black near the analysis point.  The finite difference approximations of the derivative ∂v/∂y are then obtained at each of the same analysis grid points then are plotted in blue at each respective point.  The algebraic sum of the two should be plotted in green and then contoured at intervals of 2 X 10 -5s-1 and then transferred to the 300 mb wind vector chart (with the analysis domain).

 

Map Analysis

 

To get a feeling for the synoptic pattern, first contour the unanalyzed 300 mb charts for heights and isotachs using conventional interval (12 dm for height contours in solid black; 20 knot intervals in solid purple starting at 50 knots for isotachs). Use acetate first and get approval from me before transferring to the final copy.

 

Calculation

 

Teams:

 

Nick, Amanda

Devin, Xiomara

 

 

 

E.  Thought and Other Questions

 

1.       Compare and contrast your divergence analysis with that from the North American Reanalysis.

 

 

2.       (a)      Estimate the qualitative nature of the SYNOPTIC SCALE divergence on the basis of the vorticity advection shown on the Eta initialization for the same area as your contour chart.

 

         (b)     Estimate the qualitative nature of the forcing for vertical motion on the basis of temperature advection shown on the NGM                           initialization for the same area.                    

 



[1] Please remember that part of the learning experience is learning to deal with the perils, pitfalls and strengths of cooperation.  The idea here is to have the students themselves deal with the micro-management of the task, just as you will have to when assigned group tasks in the real world.  The instructor (or overseer, or boss) should not have to deal with petty squabbles, and should only be asked to adjudicate significant issues. 

 

Each group should select an overseer, who should also participate in the calculations and other tasks.  Each group should select a spokesperson who will interact with me if problems come up.  Each group should work in tandem to perform the calculations.