CONCLUSIONS
An unusual combination of mid-tropospheric wind flow and temperature
patterns surmounting an atypically buoyant sea breeze contributed
to a shear profile in the south Bay Area on 4 May 1998 favorable
for left-moving anticyclonic supercells. One such storm interacted
with the sea breeze front to produce the initial anticyclonic
vortex with a combination of landspout and supercellular characteristics.
The second clockwise vortex apparently was formed from the traditional
"supercell cascade." Meso-anticyclones identified by
the MDA on KMUX represent the first WSR-88D documentation of anticyclonic
mesocirculations in combination with anticyclonic tornadoes.
This case underscores the utility of the latest suite of WSR-88D
algorithms to detect rotation in thunderstorms, even in the low-topped
supercells common in the Pacific Coast states. This provides forecasters
in the western United States with the ability of utilizing the
WSR-88D radar with confidence in strong-to-severe weather conditions.
Heretofore, the algorithms were not particularly successful in
identifying tornadic circulations in the relatively weak low-topped
convection which is typical in California. Also, until the present
MDA upgrade, these algorithms were completely unable to identify
clockwise tornadic circulations.
Both Blier and Batten (1994) and Monteverdi and Quadros (1994)
have cautioned meteorologists in the West that all forecasters
need to be adept at interpreting buoyancy and shear profiles with
regard to the development of severe convection. Both studies pointed
out that such convection is much more frequent in the state than
previously thought, particularly in the Los Angeles area and the
Central Valley. In the present case, despite the fact that the
event occurred in densely-populated residential neighborhoods,
the mid-afternoon timing ensured minimal injuries because residents
were largely indoors. Obviously, such fortuitous timing cannot
be relied on in the future. Thus, the Sunnyvale/Los Altos tornadoes
have served as an additional warning to California meteorologists
that anticipation of severe weather is an important part of the
forecasting problem, even in the San Francisco Bay Region.
REFERENCES
Blier, W. and K. A. Batten, 1994: On the incidence of tornadoes
in California. Wea. Forecasting, 9, 301-315.
Braun, S.A. and J.P. Monteverdi, 1991: An analysisof a mesocyclone-induced tornado occurrence in northern California. Wea. Forecasting, 6, 13-31.
Hart, J. A., and J. Korotky, 1991: The SHARP Workstation -
A skew-T/hodograph analysis and research program. NOAA/NWS NWSFO.
Lipari, G.S., and J.P. Monteverdi, 2000: Convective and shear
parameters associated with northern and central California tornadoes
during the period 1990-94. 20th AMS Severe Local Storms Conf.,
Orlando, FL., this volume.
Monteverdi, J. P., C. Doswell III, and G.S. Lipari, 2000 Shear parameter thresholds for forecasting California tornadic thunderstorms. 20th AMS Severe Local Storms Conf., Orlando, FL., this volume.
_____________ and J. Quadros, 1994: Convective and rotational
parameters associated with three tornado episodes in northern
and central California. Wea Forecasting, 9, 285-300.
Rotunno, R., and J.B. Klemp, 1982. The.influence of shear-induced
pressure gradient on thunderstorm motion. Mon. Wea. Rev., 110,
136-551.
Stumpf, G. J., A. Witt, E. D. Mitchell, P. L. Spencer, J. T.
Johnson, M. D. Eilts, K. W. Thomas, and D. W. Burgess, 1998 :
The National Severe Storms Laboratory mesocyclone detection algorithm
for the WSR-88D. Wea. Forecasting, 13, 304-326.
Wakimoto, R.M., and J. W. Wilson, 1989: Non-supercell tornadoes.
Mon. Wea. Rev., 117, 1113-1140.
Weisman, M.L., and J.B. Klemp, 1982. The.dependence of numerically-simulated
convective storms on vertical wind shear and buoyancy. Mon.
Wea. Rev., 110, 504-520.
Wicker, L.J. and R.B. Wilhelmson, 1993: Numerical simulation
of tornadogenesis within a supercell thunderstorm. The tornado:
its structure, dynamics, prediction, and hazards Geophys.
Mono.79, 75-88.